PRAVEEN KUMAR S/O SHRI SUBE SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/16398/2024 · 2025-01-13
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Uma Shanker Vyas
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31874 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31874 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:1822-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 16398/2024
1. Praveen Kumar S/o Shri Sube Singh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village Neemlaka, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Khairthal-Tijara (Rajasthan).
2. Sukhbeer S/o Shri Ramotar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Neemlaka, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Khairthal- Tijara (Rajasthan).
3. Omprakash S/o Amar Singh, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Neemlaka, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Khairthal- Tijara (Rajasthan).
4. Ramprakash @ Prakash Chand S/o Shri Ramotar, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Village Neemlaka, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Khairthal-Tijara (Rajasthan).
5. Bharat Singh S/o Shri Ram, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Neemlaka, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Khairthal- Tijara (Rajasthan).
6. Rajendra Kumar S/o Shri Shiv Lal, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Village Neemlaka, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Khairthal- Tijara (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The District Collector, Khairthal-Tijara, District Khairthal- Tijara.
3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Kotkasim, District Khairthal- Tijara.
4. The Tehsildar, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Khairthal-Tijara. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Yadav For Respondent(s) : Ms. Shikha Sharma on behalf of Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 13/01/2025
1. Heard.
2. Despite time granted by this Court, the persons against whom order of removal of encroachment have been passed, have not been impleaded as party.
[2025:RJ-JP:1822-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-16398/2024]
3. Therefore, we are not inclined to proceed further in the matter.
4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ SANJAY KUMAWAT/RAJAT/60