Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31874 (RAJ)

PRAVEEN KUMAR S/O SHRI SUBE SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/16398/2024 · 2025-01-13

Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Uma Shanker Vyas

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:1822-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 16398/2024 1. Praveen Kumar S/o Shri Sube Singh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village Neemlaka, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Khairthal-Tijara (Rajasthan). 2. Sukhbeer S/o Shri Ramotar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Neemlaka, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Khairthal- Tijara (Rajasthan). 3. Omprakash S/o Amar Singh, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Neemlaka, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Khairthal- Tijara (Rajasthan). 4. Ramprakash @ Prakash Chand S/o Shri Ramotar, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Village Neemlaka, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Khairthal-Tijara (Rajasthan). 5. Bharat Singh S/o Shri Ram, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Neemlaka, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Khairthal- Tijara (Rajasthan). 6. Rajendra Kumar S/o Shri Shiv Lal, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Village Neemlaka, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Khairthal- Tijara (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, Khairthal-Tijara, District Khairthal- Tijara. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Kotkasim, District Khairthal- Tijara. 4. The Tehsildar, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Khairthal-Tijara. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Yadav For Respondent(s) : Ms. Shikha Sharma on behalf of Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 13/01/2025 1. Heard. 2. Despite time granted by this Court, the persons against whom order of removal of encroachment have been passed, have not been impleaded as party. [2025:RJ-JP:1822-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-16398/2024] 3. Therefore, we are not inclined to proceed further in the matter. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ SANJAY KUMAWAT/RAJAT/60