Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31863 (BOM)

PARVAI DATTARAO PAKHARE AND ORS v. BALIRAM SAGUJI DANGE AND ANR

CA/13679/2024 · 2025-05-07

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

51-CA-13679-25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 51 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13679 OF 2024 IN FAST/31231/2024 PARVAI DATTARAO PAKHARE AND ORS VERSUS BALIRAM SAGUJI DANGE AND ANR ... Mr. Agrawal Pawankumar Suryakiren, Advocate for Applicant Mr. A. S. Usmanpurkar, Advocate for respondent No.2, .… CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATE : 07.05.2025 PER COURT :- . Heard Mr. Agrawal, learned Advocate appearing for applicants and Mr. Usmanpurkar for respondent/insurance company. 2. By this application, applicants are seeking to condone the delay of 588 days caused in filing appeal. 3. Perused application and reasons as stated therein. It appears that applicants are litigating for getting just compensation towards death of bread earner of the family, who died in motor vehicular accident. The delay has been occasioned on account of financial difficulties and complying with various formalities. Delay is not intentional. Looking to the nature of litigation, application deserves to be allowed. Hence, following order: 1 of 2 2025:BHC-AUG:13771 (( 2 )) 51-CA-13679-25 ::ORDER:: a. Civil Application is allowed. b. Delay of 588 days caused in filing appeal is hereby condoned. c. Appeal be registered. 4. On registration of appeal, issue notice to respondents, returnable on 16.07.2025. 5. Call for R & P. 6. Mr. Usmanpurkar waives notice for respondent No.2. [ S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ] HRJadhav 2 of 2