Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:13007 RSA No. 1613 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1613 OF 2014 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
SMT.VIJAYALAKSHMI PRASANNA BIDARI AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS W/O PRASANNA R/AT KYATHABEEDU VILLAGE LAKYA HOBLI CHIKMAGALUR TALUK REP. BY GPA HOLDER M.I VEERESH AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O LATE AIYANNA RAJAJINAGAR, BIRUR KADUR TALUK CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT-577116. …APPELLANT (BY SRI.MANJUNATHA B, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SMT.U.T.KAMALAMMA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS W/O LATE K.N.PUTTEGOWDA AGRICULTURIST
2. SMT.K.P.MAMATHA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS D/O K.N.PUTTEGOWDA
Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:13007 RSA No. 1613 of 2014
3. SMT.K.P.YASHODA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS D/O K.N.PUTTEGOWDA
4. SMT.K.P.BHUVANESHWARI AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS D/O K.N.PUTTEGOWA
5. SMT.K.P.RADHA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS D/O K.N.PUTTEGOWDA
6. SRI.L.P.DATTATRI AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS S/O K.N.PUTTEGOWDA
RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 6 RESIDING AT HALE LAKYA VILLAGE LAKYA HOBLI CHIKMAGALUR TALUK
7. SRI.K.B.SANDESH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS S/O BASAVEGOWDA
8. SMT.B.K.YASHASWINI AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS W/O K.B.SANDESH
RESPONDENT NOS.7 AND 8 RESIDING AT JAYANAGAR EXTENSION CHIKMAGALUR - 577101 …RESPONDENTS (NOTICE TO R1, R.4, R.5, R.6 AND R.8 ARE SERVED)
THIS RSA IS FILED U/SEC.100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD 19.8.2014 PASSED IN R.A.NO.80/2013
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:13007 RSA No. 1613 of 2014
ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CHIKMAGALUR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 6.2.2013 PASSED IN OS.246/2008 ON THE FILE OF 2ND ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHIKMAGALUR AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellants has filed a memo stating that parties have amicably settled matter out of Court. Consequently, appeal may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
2. Memo is taken on record.
3. In view of above, appeal is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, are also disposed off.
Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21