AJAY KUMAR SHARMA v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, EAST SINGHBHUM
WPC/1411/2025 · 2025-06-13
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3185 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3185 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:15470 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 1411 of 2025 Ajay Kumar Sharma, S/o Dropati Devi Sharma, R/o 183/b, Sugnibasa, Chakulia, P.O. and P.S. Chakulia, District- East Singhbhum.
.... .. ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1.Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum. 2.Sub Divisional Magistrate cum Prabhari Officer, Jugsalai Nagar Parishad at Dhalbhum, P.O. & P.S. Jugsalai, District- East Singhbhum. 3.Shashi Srivastava, S/o Beni Prasad, owner of M/s Super Construction, a particular firm, having its office at B-20/5, Navijivan Complex, Baridih, P.O. Baridih, P.S. Sidhgora, Town Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum. 4.Gagan Singh Bhatia, S/o Banwari Singh Bhatia, owner of M/s Super Construction, a particular firm, having its office at B-20/5, Navijivan Complex, Baridih, P.O. Baridih, P.S. Sidhgora, Town Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum.
.. ... ...Respondent(s) ...........
CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ......... For the Petitioner (s) : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suresh Kumar, SC (L&C)-II …... 03/ 13.06.2025. Heard, learned counsel for the parties.
1. The instant Writ Petition has been filed for direction upon the Respondent No.2 [Sub Divisional Magistrate cum Prabhari Officer Jugsalai Nagar Parishad at Dhalbhum] to dispose of the application filed by the petitioner under Section 21(4) of the Jharkhand Building and Apartment Act, 2011.
2. Petitioner claims from the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 Flat No.6, area 1500 sq. feet in the Jugsalai Project, in pursuant to the agreement entered on 15.12.2012. A sum of Rs.20,50,000/- has already been paid.
3. On being aggrieved by non-registration in favour of the petitioner, representation was filed under the provisions herein-before mentioned which is still pending before the Respondent No.2.
4. Learned counsel for the State seeks time to file counter-affidavit.
5. From the averment of the Writ Petition, it is apparent that a representation was filed as per the statutory provision which is pending before the Respondent No.2. Unless and until, the said representation is decided, no purpose will be served by filing counter-affidavit.
6. Under the circumstances, Respondent No.2 [Sub Divisional Magistrate cum Prabhari Officer, Jugsalai Nagar Parishad at Dhalbhum, P.O. & P.S. Jugsalai, District- East Singhbhum] is directed
2025:JHHC:15470 2
to dispose of the representation filed by the petitioner within four weeks from the date of production/ receipt of a copy of this order. The instant Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. I.A., if any, stands disposed of.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sandeep/