Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31849 (KAR)

KALAVATHI v. BADARINATH V

CRL.RP/1391/2019 · 2025-03-11

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:10275 CRL.RP No. 1391 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1391 OF 2019 (397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: KALAVATHI W/O KRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/A NO.75, 1ST TEMPLE ROAD NEAR BJP OFFICE MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU-560003 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KUMARA L, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: BADARINATH V S/O LATE VISHWANATH M GINGADE AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/A NO.258, SRI SAI KUTEERA 6TH BLOCK, BEAL LAYOUT VIDHYARANYAPURA BANGALORE-560097 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.SUYOG HERELE.E, AMICUS CURIAE (ABSENT)) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 03.10.2018 IN C.C.NO.50109/2017 PASSED BY THE HONBLE COURT OF 4TH Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:10275 CRL.RP No. 1391 of 2019 ADDITIONAL AND 30TH ACMM (SCCH-6) SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AT BENGALURU AND ITS CONFIRMATION IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 12.09.2019 AT CRL.A.NO.2168/2018 PASSED BY THE LXIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (65) AT BENGALURU AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioner and respondent. No representation for petitioner and respondent even in the afternoon session. On 07.02.2025, after finding that there is no representation for petitioner and after imposing cost of Rs.500/-, a conditional order was passed to the effect that if petitioner fails to get the details of respondent/complainant and take necessary steps and also fails to pay the cost, the petition would be dismissed for default. Despite the said order, today there is no representation and also acknowledgement is also not filed for having paid the cost. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:10275 CRL.RP No. 1391 of 2019 It appears petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51