[2025:RJ-JP:911] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16295/2024 Ucchabh Lal Son Of Shri Ramkishan, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Village Ballop, Tehsil Taleda, District Bundi (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Nandlal Son Of Hariram, Resident Of Village Bopatpura, Tehsil Taleda, District Bundi (Raj.) 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar Taleda Tehsil Taleda, District Bundi (Raj.) 3. Sub Registrar, Taleda, Tehsil Taleda District Bundi (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishal Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhinav Sharma Mr. Neeraj Batra, GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Order 07/01/2025 1. This petition is filed aggrieved of order dated 06.03.2024 passed by the Board of Revenue (for short ‘the Board’), Ajmer. 2. The short grievance raised is that the revision under Section 230 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’) is not maintainable. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 though opposses the prayer is not in a position to defend the maintainability of revision against an interim order in view of the clear language of Section 230 of the Act. However, prayer is made that the S.D.O. Court be directed to decide the application for interim injunction in [2025:RJ-JP:911] (2 of 2) [CW-16295/2024] accordance with law after providing an opportunity of hearing to both the parties. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no serious objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for respondent No.1. 5. In view of the above, the writ petition is allowed. The impugned order is set aside. The S.D.O. Court concerned shall proceed and decide the application for temporary injunction afresh in accordance with law, expeditiously and after providing an opportunity of hearing to both the parties. The application be decided not later than three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Riya/72