V.M. Prasad, E-369194, Driver v. The A.P.S.R.T.C.,
WP/27719/2014 · 2025-03-12
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31844 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31844 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010464742014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 27719/2014 Between: V.m. Prasad ...PETITIONER AND The A P S R T C and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S M SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. P DURGA PRASAD SC FOR APSRTC
2 The Court made the following order:-
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition is filed assailing the Suspension order. Subsequently, the authorities have conducted the inquiry, as per the procedure. Hence, the matter has rendered infructuous.
Recording the above submission, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO Date: 12.03.2025
KBN
3 24 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.27719 of 2014
Date: 12.03.2025
KBN