APHC010465502025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 23597 OF 2025 Between: R Gali Reddy, S/o. China Pitchi Reddy, aged 30 years. Occ- Cultivation, R/o.Kalanuthala(V), Peddaraveedu(M), Prakasam District. ...Petitioner AND Principal Secretary, Revenue 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Dept., Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur. 2. Collector and District Magistrate, Tirupati, Tirupati District. 3. Sub Collector, Markapuram Division, Markapuram, Prakasam District. 4. Tahsildar, Dornala Mandal, Dornala, Prakasam District. 5. Smt. B Sulochana Devi, W/o. B.M.Subbarayudu, aged 65 years, Occ- House Wife, R/o.4/506, Teru Bazar, Markapur, Prakasam Dist., aged 36 years, Occ- 6. B Ashok Kumar, S/o. B.M.Subba Rayudu, Business, R/o.4/506, Teru Bazar, Markapur, Prakasam Dist. 7. B Venugopal, S/o. B.M.Subba Rayudu, aged 34 years, Occ- Business, R/o.4/506, Teru Bazar, Markapur, Prakasam Dist., 8. B Mohan Rao, S/o. B.M.Subba Rayudu, aged 58 years, Occ- Business, R/0.7/325A, Peram Bazar, Markapur, Prakasam Dist., 9. B Suresh, S/o. late Mallaiah, R/o.7/237, Nehru Bazar, Markapur, Prakasam Dist., Smt. V Parvathi Devi, W/o. late Venkateswarlu, aged 69 years, Occ- House Wife, R/o.7/16,1st Line, Vasavi Nagar, Kandukuru Town and Mandal,Nellore Dist., aged 47 years, Occ- Business, 10. 11. Smt. S Lakshmi Devi, W/o. Malyadri, aged 55 years, Occ- House R/O.1/203-A-174, Sravani Mess, Tarlupadu Road, Markapur, Prakasam Dist., Smt. K Rama Devi, W/o. Ayyappa Swamy aged 53 years, Occ- House Wife, R/o. Kirana Shop, Main Road, Ardhaveedu V dm M, Prakasam Dist., Wife, 12. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ/Order/ Direction more particularly one in the Nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in interfering with possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the land to an extent of Ac. 1-20 cents situated in Sy.No.98 of Ayinamukkala(V), Dornala(M), Prakasam District as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction besides violation of Art. 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th Respondent to follow the due process of law and to pass. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4**^ Respondent not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner over to the subject land to an extent of Ac. 1-20 cents situated in Sy.No.98 of Ayinamukkala(V), Domala(M), Prakasam pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVASULU KURRA Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.5 to 12: None appeared The Court made the following Order: District APHC010465502025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 23597 of 2025 Between: 1.R GALI REDDY, S/0. CHINA PITCHI REDDY, AGED 30 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION PEDDARAVEEDU(M), PRAKASAM DISTRICT. R/O.KALANUTHALA(V) ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARIAT, SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPT., VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR. 2. COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, TIRUPATI TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3. SUB MARKAPURAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. TAHSILDAR, DORNALA MANDAL, DORNALA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. COLLECTOR, MARKAPURAM DIVISION, 5. SMT B SULOCHANA DEVI, W/0. B.M.SUBBARAYUDU, AGED 65 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, R/O.4/506, TERU BAZAR, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAMDIST., 6. B ASHOK KUMAR, S/0. B.M.SUBBA RAYUDU, AGED 36 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O.4/506, TERU BAZAR, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAMDIST., 7. B VENUGOPAL, S/0. B.M.SUBBA RAYUDU, AGED 34 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O.4/506, TERU BAZAR, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DIST., 8. B MOHAN RAO, S/0. B.M.SUBBA RAYUDU, AGED 58 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/0.7/325A, PERAM BAZAR, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DIST., 9. B SURESH, S/0. LATE MALLAIAH, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/0.7/237, NEHRU BAZAR, MARKAPUR, 7 PRAKASAM DIST., 10.SMT V PARVATHI DEVI, W/0. LATE VENKATESWARLU, AGED 69 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, R/0.7/16,1ST LINE, VASAVI NAGAR, MANDAUNELLORE DIST., 11.SMT S LAKSHMI DEVI, W/0. MALYADRI, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, R/O.1/203-A-174, SRAVANI MESS, TARLUPADU ROAD, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DIST., 12.SMT K RAMA DEVI, W/0. AYYAPPA SWAMY AGED 53 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, R/0. KIRANA SHOP, MAIN ROAD, ARDHAVEEDU V DM M, PRAKASAM DIST., KANDUKURU TOWN AND ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ/Order/ Direction more particularly one in the Nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in interfering with possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the land to an extent of Ac. 1-20 cents situated in Sy.No.98 of Ayinamukkala(V), Dornala(M), Prakasam District as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction besides violation of Art. 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th Respondent to follow the due process of law and to pass such other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SRINIVASULU KURRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: V ORDER: Precisely, the present Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of the respondents in interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the land to an extent of Acs. 1.20 cents situated in Sy.No.98 of Ayinamukkala Village, Dornala Mandal, Prakasam District, as it amounts to illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction besides violation of Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India. Learned State Counsel has provided written instructions dated 08.09.2025, which is addressed by the Tahsildar to the Government Pleader Office, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. After reviewing written instructions, it appears that the petitioner has settled the issue and it is further asserted that the Tahsildar is not interfering with the possession of the writ petitioner. 2. Recording the same, the present Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. As a sequel thereto. Interlocutory Applications pending, if any shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR J. //TRUE COPY// SECTIOi^FFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri SRINIVASULU KURRA, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCS to GP for REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies vna ■K HIGH COURT DATED:15/09/2025 ORDER WP NO. 23597 OF 2025 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS