Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:52601 Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 2335 of 2025 Applicant :- Ajju @ Arash Malik Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Shashank Shekhar Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State- opposite party no. 1, and perused the material placed on record. 2. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 250 of 2024, under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 317(5) B.N.S., Police Station Wave City, District Ghaziabad. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. The name of the applicant was disclosed by co- accused, who were arrested at the spot. The stolen articles were also recovered from the persons, who were arrested at the spot. It is next contended that identically placed co-accused Ayyub and Mohd. Hasan have been granted anticipatory bail till the submission of police report by this Court vide orders dated 03.10.2024 and 15.10.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS Nos. 9707 of 2024, Ayyub v. State of U.P., and 9907 of 2024, Mohd. Hasan v. State of U.P., respectively. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. It is next submitted that the investigation is going on and the applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case. 4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicant and, in particular, the fact that the name of the applicant was disclosed by co-accused, who were arrested at the spot; the stolen articles were also recovered from the persons who were arrested at the spot; and, identically placed co-accused Ayyub and Mohd.
Hasan have been granted anticipatory bail till the submission of police report by this Court, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police
report. 7. In the event of arrest, the applicant- Ajju @ Arash Malik (Minor) be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 193(3) B.N.S.S., on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned. 8. In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant. 9. The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant. 10. The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present
order.
11. The application stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 10.4.2025 SKT/- Digitally signed by :- SHIVA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad