Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31833 (AP)

PALAGANI VENKATESWARAMMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/7023/2023 · 2025-08-31

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010465412023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION No. 7023/2023 Between: 1. PALAGANI VENKATESWARAMMA, W/O VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O GODWDAPETA, GANNAVARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. PARASA SARITHA, W/O SATISH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O CHINA AGRIPALLI VILLAGE, AGRIPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. MAREEDU ARUNA SRI @ ARUNA, W/O KRISHNA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O PAATHA RAAVICHERLA VILLAGE, NUZVID MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. PAMARTHI VIJAYA, W/O PIDUGU RAMUDU, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O NARIKEPAALEM, H/O NADUPURU VILLAGE, PEDANA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. PAMARTHI PIDUGU RAMUDU @ RAMU, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O NARIKEPAALEM, H/O NADUPURU VILLAGE, PEDANA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. MAREEDU VENKATA KRISHNA PRASAD, S/O VEERA RAGHAVULU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O PAATHA RAAVICHERLA VILLAGE, NUZVID MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , THROUGH SHO MUSUNURU POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI 2. PALAGANI LAKSHMI, D/O CHALARI RAMBABU W/O PALAGANI SIVA RAMA KOTESWARA RAO, R/O GOPAVARAM VILLAGE, MUSUNURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Charge sheet filed against A2 to A7 in C.C.No.456 of 2023 pending on the file of Honourable Judicial Magistrate of First Class At Nuzvid, for the alleged offences punishable Under Section 498(A), of I.P.C. and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and pass such 2 Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. PILLI SUNDEEP Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. CH B R P SEKHAR ORDER: The instant Criminal Petition is filed by the Petitioners under Section 5482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (For short „Cr.P.C.) for the following relief: “ ... to quash the Charge sheet filed against A2 to A7 in C.C.No.456 of 2023 pending on the file of Honourable Judicial Magistrate of First Class At Nuzvid, for the alleged offences punishable Under Section 498(A), of I.P.C. and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and pass such ...” The marriage of Respondent No.2 herein was performed with A.1 on 12.05.2022 in the presence of elders. The parents of Respondent No.2 gave dowry and other lanchanams to the petitioners herein. Due to disputes between the couple, wife and husband lived separately and she filed a complaint before the Police which is registered as a case in Crime No.100 of 2023 of Musunuru Police Station, Eluru District, against A.1 to A.7, for the offences punishable under Sections 489-A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. After completion of investigation, Police filed charge sheet which is numbered as CC No.456 of 2023 on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nuzvid. Petitioners herein are A.2 to A.7, who are mother in law, sisters-in-law and their husbands. Seeking quashment of the Proceedings against them in CC No. 456 of 2023, Petitioners herein filed the present criminal petition. 3 During the pendency of this Criminal Petition, parties made a request before this Court that they intend to compromise the matter and accordingly, directed the parties to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati for taking necessary steps. Parties are identified by their respective learned counsels on record. Copies of the Aadhar cards of the parties attested by their respective counsel are filed for proper identification. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance. Respondent No.2 submitted before this Court that she has no issues with the Petitioners and there is no coercion and undue influence for settling the issue with the Petitioners and she acknowledged receipt of Rs.8,00,000/- paid by petitioner No.1 herein and the amount will be kept in fixed deposit in due course of time. Considering the submissions, in the interests of justice, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the Proceedings in CC No.456 of 2023 on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nuzvid, against the Petitioners 1 to 7 / A.2 to A.7 are hereby quashed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Criminal Petition No. 7023 of 2023 01.09.2025 Mjl /*