APrtCOI 0013432023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 548 OF 2023 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by the Order dated 22.11.2022 in I.A.No.187 of 2022, in O.S.No.143 of 2014 on the file of the Court of the X Addl. District Judge, Tirupati, Chittoor District. Between: Amarapuram Manjunath, S/o A. Krishna Rao, Age. 60 years, Occ. Business, R/o. D.No. 19-8-210/1, Hathiramji Colony, RC Road, Tirupati District. ...Petitioner/Respondent No.l/Plaintiff AND 1. Dr. Badugu Ramalakshmi, W/o. Dr. Singapati Subbarao, Aged about 52 years, Occ. Doctor. R/o. D.No.18-1-502/B10, RNR Apartments, KT Road, Tirupati. 2. M/S SDN Housing Pvt Ltd, Age 50 years. Rep. by its Chairman. V.Dasaradha Naidu, S/o. Munaswamy Naidu, R/o. Plot No.17, New Balaji Colony, Tirupati. 3. Macharla Lakshmi Ranga Vardhini, W/o. B.V. Subbarao, Aged about 62 years, Rio. D.No.13-1-201/A, Plot No.3. Balaji Swarnapuri Colony, Mothi Nagar, Hyderabad.. 4. T Siddeswara Reddy, S/o. T. Chinna Sidda Reddy, Aged about 62 years, R/o. Plot No.66, Vasanth Nagar, Kukatpalli, Hyedarabad City. 5. Kommineni Saroja, W/o. Kommlneni Srinivasulu, Aged about 59 years, R/o. D.No.5-69/32, 15th Cross, Srikrishna Nagar, MR Palle, Tirupati District. 6. S Ramakrishan Reddy, S/o. S. Bayyapu Reddy, Aged about 65 R/o. Plot No.101. Santhi Apartments Hyedarabad City. years, Bhavya Nagar. Kukatpalli, ...Respondents lA NO: 1 OF 20:?.? Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pieased to stay aii further proceedings in O.S.No.143 of 2014 on the fiie of the Court of the X Addl. District Judge, Tirupati. lA NO: 2 OF 202:^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to file the additional material papers in the Civil Revision Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G JAGADEESWAR Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared The Court made the following Order: 1 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.548 of2023 APHC010013432023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 548/2023 Between: 1.AMARAPURAM MANJUNATH, S/0 A. KRISHNA RAO. AGE. 60 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS HATHIRAMJI COLONY, RC ROAD, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER R/0. D.NO. 19-8-210/1, AND 1.DR BADUGU RAMALAKSHMI SUBBARAO R/0. D.N0.18-1-502/B10, RNR APARTMENTS, TIRUPATI. W/0. DR. SINGAPATI AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. DOCTOR. KT ROAD, 2.M/S SDN HOUSING PVT LTD, AGE . 50 YEARS, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN. V.DASARADHA NAIDU, S/0. MUNASWAMY NAIDU, TIRUPATI. 3.MACHARLA LAKSHMI RANGA VARDHINI, SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RIO. D.NO.13-1- 201/A, PLOT N0.3. BALAJI SWARNAPURI COLONY, MOTHI NAGAR, HYDERABAD.. R/0. PLOT N0.17, NEW BALAJI COLONY, W/0. B.V. 4.T SIDDESWARA REDDY, S/0. T. CHINNA SIDDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/0. PLOT N0.66, VASANTH 2 tcdsj C.R.P. 1^0.548 of2023 NAGAR, KUKATPALLI HYEDARABAD CITY. ■®paue,tr„pSSc?“"’ 5.K0MMINENI aged about 59 years SRIKRISHNA NAGAR W/0. 6.S RAMAKRISHAN aged about apartments, HYEDARABAD CITY. REDDY, 65 YEARS, bhavya S/0, s. BAYYAPU R/0. PLOT No. NAGAR. REDDY, '*01. SANTHI KUKATPALLI, -RESPONDENT(S): iliUsSs Rev,s,on Petition before this Honlfe 000^®°"" !ANOi1_OFM23 X Petition the High Court 0;S.no.143 , ■ ^udge, Tirupati 151 CPP the affidavit filed in ' ["ay be Pleased to stay in the petition, proceedings in Addl. District of 2014 9nd pass iAjS!Oi^OF20^ Petition under Section c'rcumstances stated i ^ the High Court the additional Counsel for the "JSI CPC the affidavit filed i be Pleased Pleased 'Material papers i praying that i support of the in the petition, petitioner to file Petition and in in fh P®''^'t the the Civil Revision pass Petitioner; JAGADEESWAR Counsel for the Respond 1.G ent(S): 1. 3 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.548 of2023 The Court made the following order; It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the revision petition does not survive. The said submission is placed on record. 2. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as 3. infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall 4. stand closed. Sd/- A VENUGOPALA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTtON OFFICER To, 1. The X Additional District Judge, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 2. One CC to Sri G Jagadeeswar, Advocate [OPUC] 3. The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 4. Two CD Copies vna HIGH COURT DATED;30/06/2025 ORDER g 0 6 AUG 2n?5 ^ . Current Section ^ CRP NO. 548 OF 2023 Ot *// DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS