APHC010465612025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 24562 of 2025 Between: 1. MALLANGI SIVA PRASAD REDDY, S/O.GANGI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O.YERRABALLI KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, PULIVENDULA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA. 3. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIIONAL OFFICER, PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. 4. NALANGI GANGI REDDY, S/O.BAYAPU REDDY AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/O.NAGOOR VILLAGE OFVEMPALLE MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not receiving and not entertaining the Appeal filed by the petitioner against the orders of respondent No.G/753/2025, dt. 16.07.2025, which is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also Section 16 of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens At, 2007, consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to receive and dispose of the Appeal filed by the 2 petitioner against the orders of the 3 respondent vide Ref No.G/753/2025, dt. 16.07.2025. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. HARINADH NIDAMANURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Succinctly, the present Writ Petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not entertaining the appeal filed against the order of the 3rd respondent – Revenue Divisional Officer in Ref.No.G/753/2025 dated 16.07.2025. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader secured written instructions dated 05.10.2025 (part of record). As seen from the said written instructions, it transpires that the appeal filed by the petitioner against the orders of the 3rd respondent is under scrutiny. 3. Therefore, nothing survives in the present Writ Petition to adjudicate the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Appeal filed by the writ petitioner was entertained and as it is under scrutiny, nothing survives in the present Writ Petition. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. The appellate authority is directed to dispose of the appeal, as expeditiously as possible. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 06.10.2025 siva 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.24562 of 2025 Date: 06.10.2025 siva