Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3182 (AP)

GUDISI RAJA REDDY v. BALANAGU REDDEMMA

CRP/239/2023 · 2025-06-29

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010013602023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 239/2023 Between: 1. GUDISI RAJA REDDY, S/O VENKATARAMANA REDDY AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURIST, R/O MALEPADU VILLAGE AND POST, MADANAPALLE TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 2. GUDISI RAMI REDDY, GUDISI RAMI REDDY S/O VENKATARAMANA REDDY AGE. 54 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O MALEPADU VILLAGE AND POST, MADANAPALLE TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. GUDISI GURUVA REDDY, S/O VENKATARAMANA REDDY AGE. 62 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O MALEPADU VILLAGE AND POST, MADANAPALLE TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. GUDISI NAGARAJA REDDY, S/O VENKATARAMANA REDDY AGE. 55 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O MALEPADU VILLAGE AND POST, MADANAPALLE TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 2 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.239 of 2023 1. BALANAGU REDDEMMA, w/o B.Subbaramu Age. 55 years, Occ. Agriculture, 9 R/o Malepadu Village and Post, Madanapalle Town and Mandal, Chittoor District ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tobeg to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition having been aggrieved by the Docket Order dated 06.07.2022 passed in I.A.No.311 of 2022 in OS.No.164 of 2013, on the file of I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Madanapalle, IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S. No. 164 of 2013 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Madanapalle and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K SITA RAM Counsel for the Respondent: 1. 3 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.239 of 2023 The Court made the following order: It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date: 30.06.2025 KGR