IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Exe. Pet. No. 1064 of 2024 Decided on: 01.08.2025 Babu Ram … Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation, Shimla and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ___________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Counsel for the respondents informs the Court that as per his instructions, instructions have been issued to release the amount of Rs.1,24,479/- in favour of the petitioner. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in light of the fact that more than Rs.5.00 Lac is still due to the petitioner, the payment of emoluments in piecemeal will not serve any purpose. 3. This Court is of the considered view that if as on today, only about Rs.5.00 Lac is left to be paid to the petitioner, who retired from a Class-III post, the petitioner would not be in a position to utilize the money which is due to him from the respondent- Corporation, if the same is paid to him in instalments. Therefore, this petition is disposed of with direction that let the entire balance amount, as is due to the petitioner, be definitely paid to him within a 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 period of eight weeks from today. 4. It is observed that in case, needful is not done within the stipulated time, then the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of this petition. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 01, 2025 (narender)