IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.11672 of 2025 Date of decision: 21.07.2025 Rakesh Kumar. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Tanuj Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Choudhary, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 & 2-State. : Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner’s grievance is to order dated 16.07.2025, whereby he has been transferred to GSSS Tangling, District Kinnaur, vice respondent No.3, pursuant to the decision in Malti vs. The State of H.P. & Ors.2. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition, as the petitioner intends to represent to the respondents for redressal of his grievances. In case, the petitioner represents to the respondents, the same be decided expeditiously in accordance with law. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2 CWP No.1002 of 2025 decided on 21.06.2025. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 21st July, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)