PUSHPABAI KASTURCHAND BADJATE v. JITENDRA YEDUNANDAN CHAVADA AND OTHERS
WP/12309/2024 · 2025-06-13
Shri Rohit W Joshi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31792 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31792 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
913-ca-3788-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 913 WRIT PETITION NO. 12309 OF 2024 Pushpabai kasturchand badjate Versus Jitendra yedunandan chavada and others … Mr. J. M. Murkute, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondents Mr. N. S. Muthiyan, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr. V. P. Bakal, Advocate for Respondent No.2 Mr. L. V. Sangit, Advocate for Respondent No.6. … WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3788 OF 2025 IN WP/12309/2024 Jitendra Yedunandan Chawda And Others Versus Pushpabai Kasturchand Badjate And Others ... Mr. N. S. Muthiyan, Advocate for Applicants Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondent/s-State ...
CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
DATED :
13th JUNE 2025 PER COURT :-
1. This petition challenges order refusing to grant interim relief in a revision arising out of mutation proceedings. The revision application is pending since more than one and half year.
2. In view of the above rather than going into the merits of the matter it will be expedient that the Revisional authority/Respondent Narwade 2025:BHC-AUG:15174
913-ca-3788-2025 -2- No.7 is directed to decide the Revision on merits within a stipulated period.
3. Respondent No.7 is directed to decide the revision application on or before 15th September 2025.
4. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
5. In the meantime, interim order granted by this Court vide order dated 14.11.2024 shall continue.
6. Needless to mention that the revision shall be decided on merits of the case without influenced by the interim order passed by this Court.
7. Pending Civil Applications are disposed of.
(ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.) Narwade