-1- 2025:CGHC:29081 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3061 of 2020 M/s Anand And Company Through Its Proprietor Mr. Sukh Deo Munjwani, S/o Late Shri Hukumatrai Munjwani Aged About 61 Years, S-1, M.B. Trade Center, Opposite To Shanti Mandir, Ghadi Chowk, Dhamtari Chhattisgarh, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chhattisgarh Medical Services Corporation Ltd. Through Its Managing Director, Second Floor, North West, Commercial Complex, Sector 27, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The General Manager (Finance), Chhattisgarh Medical Services Corporation Ltd, Second Floor, North West, Commercial Complex, Sector 27, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Superintendent Engineer, Chhattisgarh Medical Services Corporation Ltd., Second Floor, North West, Commercial Complex, Sector 27, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Executive Engineer ( E And M), Chhattisgarh Medical Services Corporation Ltd., Second Floor, North West, Commercial Complex, Sector 27, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - The Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh Medical Services Corporation Ltd., Raipur Engineering Divisional Office, Directorate Medical Education, Old Nurses Hostel, First Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- Floor, Room No. 7, Near Lalganga Shopping Mall, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. R. S. Patel, Advocate For State : Mr. Prateek Tiwari, Panel Lawyer For Respondents No. 2 to 6 : Mr. Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 30.06.2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. Hence, he seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. 2) The prayer is not opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 3) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim