Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31783 (AP)

SRI SANKATI MASTAN RAO v. UMMAREDDY NAGA SEETHA MAHALAKSHMI

CRP/2523/2024 · 2025-04-10

Ninala Jayasurya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010465342024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2523/2024 Between: Sri Sankati Mastan Rao and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Ummareddy Naga Seetha Mahalakshmi and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P THIRUMALA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: As seen from the earlier docket proceedings, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner continuously, even though the matter is listed under the caption for dismissal. 2. Even today also, there is no representation for the petitioners. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date: 10.04.2025 LSP 155 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2523/2024 Date: 10.04.2025 LSP