Tauseef 936-CA.9744.2024.odt IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9744 OF 2024 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9744 OF 2024 IN IN SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO.32890 OF 2023 SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO.32890 OF 2023 Indumati W/o. Sangram Gude & Anr. Indumati W/o. Sangram Gude & Anr. ...Applicants ...Applicants Versus Versus Shankar S/o. Baswantrao Gude Shankar S/o. Baswantrao Gude …Respondent …Respondent _____________________________________________________ Adv. Sajed W. Khan h/f. Adv. Pankaj A. Bharat for Applicants. Adv. J. M. Murkute for Respondent. _____________________________________________________ CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATE : 8th JANUARY 2025 P.C.:- 1. Heard learned Advocate appearing for respective parties. 2. Applicants seeks to condone the delay of 29 days caused in filing the appeal. 3. Having considered submissions advanced and reasons as Having considered submissions advanced and reasons as stated in the application, sufficient cause is made out to condone the stated in the application, sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay. Hence, application is allowed. The delay of 29 days caused in delay. Hence, application is allowed. The delay of 29 days caused in filing the appeal is condoned. Appeal be registered, subject to removal filing the appeal is condoned. Appeal be registered, subject to removal of office objections. of office objections. (S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.) 1 of 1 2025:BHC-AUG:718