2025:JHHC:13858 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 2271 of 2025 ---------- Sunil Kumar Yadav, aged about 28 years, son of late Ramdeo Prasad Yadav, resident of Badki Bergi, P.O. Chalmo Barmasiya, P.S. Dumri, District Giridih. ………. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Jharkhand, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 3. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Compassionate Committee, Giridih, at P.O. and PS. Giridih, District Giridih. 4. Additional Collector, Giridih, at P.O. and PS. Giridih, District Giridih. 5. The Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Department, Government of Jharkhand, Giridih, at P.O. and PS. Giridih, District Giridih. 6. Deputy Collector (District Establishment), Giridih, at P.O. and PS. Giridih, District Giridih. 7. District Welfare Officer, Giridih, at P.O. and PS. Giridih, District Giridih. ………. Respondents. ---------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anuj Kr. Trivedi, Advocate Mr. Rohit Kr. Gupta, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Devesh Krishna, SC(M)-III ---------- 06/ 08.05.2025 The instant application has been preferred by the petitioner praying for a direction upon the respondents to upgrade him from Grade-IV to Grade- III post as per Jharkhand Government Resolution dated 02.01.2008 issued under memo No. 34, as the petitioner was appointed on compassionate ground on account of death of his father by the extremists. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that suffice it would be if this writ petition is treated as representation of the petitioner and a direction be given to the respondents to pass a reasoned order within a stipulated period of time. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since no counter- affidavit has been filed as such, petitioner may be directed to file fresh 2025:JHHC:13858 2 representation before the respondent-authorities so that his grievance can be redressed. 4. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances and limited submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the 3rd Respondent to treat this writ application as representation and take a decision with regard to the claim made by the petitioner in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulations and also the order passed in W.P.(S). No. 3933 of 2021 (Sri Manoj Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand & Ors.), disposed of on 19.09.2024, by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Petitioner is directed to serve a copy of this writ application to the concerned respondent so that his grievance can be redressed at the earliest. 5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) kunal/-