[2025:RJ-JP:32577] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1220/2023 1. Padam S/o Ratto, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Surajpole Gate, Bharatpur, Distt. Bharatpur.(Raj.). 2. Omi S/o Shri Bhajan Lal, R/o Mathura Gate, Harijan Basti, Distt. Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 3. Mahesh S/o Babu@ Babuli, R/o Surajpole Gate, Bharatpur, Distt. Bharatpur. 4. Mahesh S/o Shri Kali Charan, R/o Kumher Gate, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 5. Man Singh S/o Shri Brij Lal, R/o Mathura Gate, Harijan Basti, Distt. Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Hridesh Kumar Sharma, Director Cum Special Secretary, Department Of Local Bodies, State Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.parivahan Marg, Shivaji Nagar, Jaipur. 2. Veena Mahavar, Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Bharatpur. 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary , Department Of Local Bodies, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar on behalf of Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 19/08/2025 1. No one is present on behalf of the petitioners. 2. The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioners alleging non-compliance of order dated 07.12.2022 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3880/2016. [2025:RJ-JP:32577] (2 of 2) [CCP-1220/2023] 3. Vide order dated 07.12.2022, the Court allowed the petitioners to make the representation within a period of three weeks before the authorities, narrating complete facts relating to their work on the post of driver. The Court further observed that if such representation is received, the respondents shall decide the same within a period of three weeks thereafter. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the representation submitted by the petitioners has been duly considered in the light of orders and circulars issued by the department and same has been rejected vide order dated 24.02.2023. 5. The order dated 24.02.2023 has also been placed on record as document (Annexure-3) alongwith the compliance report. 6. In view of the order dated 24.02.2023, whereby the representation of the petitioners has been decided, the Court finds that the order passed by the Court has been duly complied with by the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is dismissed. 8. Notices stand discharged. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/Satyendra/198