IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 16020 of 2025 Decided on: 13.10. 2025 _________________________________________________________________ Adam Ram ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr.Aman Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N.Sharma Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________________________ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. L.N.Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed for grant of following substantive reliefs:- “1. That the Respondents especially respondent no 2 may be directed to grant and allow full financial benefits/ arrears to the Petitioner at par with other similarly situated employees / counter parts as mentioned in the Petition who have been allowed full financial 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - benefits on account of counting of service rendered as Casual Patwari for service benefits. Annexure P-2 may be modified to this extent. 2. The Respondents especially Respondent No 2 may be directed to consider and decide the Representation Annexure P-6 by way of speaking order in a time bound manner.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred a representation dated 29.11.2023 (Annexure P-6) to respondents No.2 and 3 for the redressal of his grievances raised in this writ petition. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be content in case respondent No.2/competent authority is directed to decide the aforesaid representation within a fixed time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 29.11.2023 (Annexure P-6) in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. - 3 - The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge October 13, 2025 R.Atal