Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31768 (AP)

Korimela Tara Priya, v. State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary

WP/21400/2018 · 2025-07-14

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

! , h \A APHC01045758201fi IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA at amaravati (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAP^ WRIT PETITION NO: 21400 of PRADESH FIVE the honourable dr justice Between: Korimela Tara Priya, W/o Raghuveer Nirmala Nagar, Ongole Town, > Aged 24 Years, Occ. House Prakasam District. wife, R/o ...PETITIONER^ AND n to Government 2 Sun Velagapudi, Amaravati. Guntur District ' 2. Supenntendent of Poiice, Prakasam District at Ongoie 3. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole . nsp^ctor Of Police, Ongole Circle Poiice Station, Ongole, Prakasam 1. State of Andhra Pradesh 5. Station House Officer District. Ongole I Town Police Station Ongole, Prakasam 6. Korimela Raghuveer, S/o Raveendra T. Korimela Raveendra, Aged 29 Years S/o Subbaiah, Aged 58 Years. 8. Korimela Meena Kumari, W/o Raveendra, Aged 51 Years 9. Konmela Videesha, D/o Raveendra, Aged 25 Years. 6 to 9 are R/o D.No.26-3 ., „ Sai Nagar, Bank Colony Nellore Town, S.P.S.R. Nellore District. 10. Metia Ashok Kumar @ Ashok r R/o Sai Nagar, 2nd iine, Kandukur , Divi Nagar, Babu, S/o Venkaiah, Aged 55 Years Town, Prakasam District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226^of the Constitution of India 'n the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be WRIT OF MANDAMUS deT Particularly one in the nature MANDAMUS declanng the action of Respondents king up investigation in FIR No. 120/2018, against Respondents No. 6 to 323, 354, 506, 509 r/w praying that in the circumstances stated i pleased to issue of No. 2 to 5 in not dated 25.04.2018 registered 10 for the offences 34 IRC on the file of Respondent punishable under Sections No.5 by arresting the <0 non-discharge of ' - Criminal Procedure, accused for the offences amounts conferred under the 1973 and violative of Article provisions of Code of 14 of Constitution of India respondent to complete the investigation and - accused persons and consequently direct the 5th file Charge Sheet against the in the said expeditiously. crimes lA NO: 1 OF 9m a Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances in support Of the petition, the High Court respondent to complete the i stated in the affidavit filed i direct the 5*'^ may be pleased investigation in FIR No. 54/2018, dated 30.01.2018 registered against Respondents No. 6 to 10 for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 354, 506, 509 r/w by arresting the 34 I PC on the file of Respondent No.5 accused persons for the offences committed by them. expeditiously pending disposal of main Writ Petition. M/s. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Nos.1 to 5: GP FOR HOME ^ Nos.6 to 10:— Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent Counsel for the Respondent The Court made the following order: APHC010457582018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 21400/2018 Between: 1.KORIMELA TARA PRIYA, W/0 RAGHUVEER, AGED 24 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O.NIRMALA NAGAR, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 4. INSPECTOR OF POLICE ONGOLE CIRCLE POLICE STATION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. STATION HOUSE OFFICER ONGOLE I TOWN POLICE STATION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. KORIMELA RAGHUVEER, S/0 RAVEENDRA, AGED 29 YEARS, 7. KORIMELA RAVEENDRA, S/0 SUBBAIAH, AGED 58 YEARS. 8. KORIMELA MEENA KUMARI, W/0 RAVEENDRA, AGED 51 YEARS. 9. KORIMELA VIDEESHA, D/0 RAVEENDRA, AGED 25 YEARS. 6 TO 9 ARE R/0 D.NO.26-3-1026, SAI NAGAR. BANK COLONY, DM NAGAR, NELLORE TOWN, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. 10.METLA ASHOK KUMAR ASHOK BABU, S/0 VENKAIAH, AGED 55 YEARS, R/0 SAI NAGAR, 2ND LINE, KANDUKUR TOWN. PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondents 25.04.2018 registered against Resm'T? No-120/2018, dated punishable under Sections 323 354 "soe'snq”'^ *° offences Respondent No.5 by arresting the accused fn?l «« of them, as illegal, irregular, and amounts tn nnn committed by ""der the provisions of Code o? Criminafp®® ff^e accused persons in the sald'Strou^^ry^^^^^L^^^ Counsel for the Petitioner- 1NIMMAGADDAREVATHI rrp pno U® R®®P°ndent(S): 1GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is hied by the Petitioner seeding indulgence of 'S ouit under ArtiCe 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: nature of'WSt Sf®MANMMU^dedarira‘th" T® m the to 5 in not taking up investigation in FIR No forlnn?^ re^stered against Respondents No 6 ot m 25.04.2018 under SecHons 323, 354, 506, 509 pw 34 ^ P“"'=hable No.5 by arresting the accused for the offenres ” ® Respondent Illegal, irregular, and amounts to non^^^f committed by them, as conferred under the provisions of Cod^^r^- obligation violative of Article 14 of Constitution of Indiflnd™ 1973 and S respondent to complete the investteta and fi“^f direct the accused persons in the said crimes expedibously a^d^'®® pass .... 2. Learned Assistant respondents on instructions a direction to Government Pleader for Home appearing for since this writ petition is filed for investigation and file charge sheet, concerned police. would submit that si complete the i directions may be given to the appropriate 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the concerned police to complete the investigation as per law if not completed so far and file final report within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// OFFICER SEC To, Government, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur Districts 2. Supenntendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongol^ 4. inspector of Police, Ongole Circle Police Station, Ongole, Prakasam District. 5. Station District. 6. One CC to M/s. Nimmagadda Revathi, Advocate [OPUC] ^ GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 1. The Prlnpipal Secretary to House Officer, Ongole I Town Police Station, Ongole, Prakas^ 7. Two CCs to 8. Two CD Copies. ssb J HIGH COURT DATED; 15/07/2025 ORDER WP No.21400 OF 2018 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS