1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.504 of 2025 ------ Ratan Xalxo, son of Mangra Xalxo, resident of Anand Marg, Hesal, Post Hesal, Police Station Shukhdeo Nagar, District Ranchi. … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Principal Secretary, Drinking Water and Sanitation Department, Government of Jharkhand, Office situated at Nepal House, Post and Police Station Doranda, District Ranchi. 3. The Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Additional Secretary, Drinking Water and Sanitation Department, Government of Jharkhand, Office situated at Nepal House, Post and Police Station Doranda, District Ranchi. 4. The Chief Engineer, Drinking Water and Sanitation Department, Government of Jharkhand, Office situated at Dumka, Post and Police Station Dumka, District Dumka. 5. The Superintending Engineer, Drinking Water and Sanitation Department, Dhanbad Division, office at Hirapur, Post Hirapur, Police Station Dhanbad (Town), District Dhanbad. 6. The Executive Engineer, Drinking Water and Sanitation Department, Dhanbad Division, office at Hirapur, Post Hirapur, Police Station Dhanbad (Town), District Dhanbad. 7. The Executive Engineer, Drinking Water and Sanitation Department, Gumla Division, office at Gumla, Post and Police Station Gumla, District Gumla. … … Respondents ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravi Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent(s): Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, AC to GP-I ------ 04/ 10.02.2025 Learned counsel representing the respondents submits that the last pay certificate and the service book of the petitioner have been transmitted to his current place of posting. 2. Learned counsel representing the petitioner has also admitted the aforesaid fact and submits that some amount has been deducted from the salary of the petitioner, for which he may be allowed to file a representation before the Authority. 3. Considering the fact that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, this writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 2 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 5. If the petitioner files any representation ventilating fresh grievance, the same may be looked into by the respondents. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant. Cp-2