3^ ■ APHC010464302025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI SMS WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER |oVvi TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE w o AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT APPEAL NO: 962 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 01-09-2025 in I.A.No.1 of 2023 in W.P.No.17601 of 2023 on fhe fiie of High Court. Between: Chodabathula Lakshmi Sarojini, W/o Late Veera Venkaiah, Hindu, Aged about 75 years, Oco: House wife, R/o, H.No.74-32/2-5/6, 3™ Street, Pandaripuram, Vijayawada, N.T.R District. ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT. 4 AND 1. Chodabatthula Pandu Ranga Rao, S/o Late Veera Aged about 52 years, Occ; NIL, Pandaripuram, Vijayawada, N.T.R District. Venkaiah, Hindu, R/o, D/No.74-32/2-4/6, Street ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principle Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Secretariat Building, Velagapudi Guntur District. 3. The District Collector, N.T.R District at Vijayawada District. at Amaravathi Erstwhile Krishna 4. The Sub Divisional Magistrate Cum Vijayawada Erst While Krishna District. 5. The Circle Inspector of Police, “ ’ ^ N.T.R district. Erst While Krishna District. Sub Collector, N.T.R District at Patamata Police Station, Vijayawada ...RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT 1 to 3 &5 lA NO: 1 OF 709*; Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct to appoint Advocate commissioner for local investigation and submit a report, forthwith. lA NO: 2 OF 207/; Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Suspend the order dt,01-09-2025 passed by the learned single Judge i I.A.No.1 of 2023 in W.P.No.17601 of 2023,before this Hon'ble High Court Amaravathi, forthwith. to in Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T. M. Counsel for the Respondent No.1: K. CHAITANYA SRI A. K. KISHORE REDDY WELFARE Counsel for the Respondent No.2:GP FOR SOCIAL Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following; JUDGMENT APHC010464302025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Bench Sr.No:-6 AT AMARAVATI [3552] SMB WRIT APPEAL NO: 962 of 2025 Chodabathula Lakshmi Sarojini ...Appellant Vs. Chodabatthula Pandu Ranga Rao and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Appellant Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): Mr. T M K Chaitanya Mr. A K Kishore Reddy for R.1 GP for Social Welfare for R.2 GP for Revenue for R.3 & R.4 CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : September, 2025 PC : The present writ appeal has been preferred against an order, dated 01.09.2025 passed in WP.No.17601 of 2023. 1. By virtue of the impugned order, the learned single Judge has directed not to evict the petitioner from the house bearing No.74-32/2-5/6, 3'^^ street, Pandaripuram, Vijayawada. The petitioner is the son of the appellant and the relations having worsened between the two has given a reason for the petitioner to the learned single Judge. 2. approach Ha & CGR, J WA_962_202;^ 3. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that in the guise of the order impugned in the present writ appeal, an impression is gathered as if the petitioner was residing in the house in question and under the protection of the said order, the petitioner would re-enter the house of the appellant. 4. Our attention has been drawn to an earlier order passed in the said writ petition, dated 20.07.2023, wherein the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner was recorded that the petitioner was not staying with his mother and had left the subject house. 5. Although an effort was made by the counsel appearing for the petitioner before us that the petitioner was in fact staying in one of the portions in the same house, however, the statement recorded earlier by the Court order, dated 20.07.2023 speaks otherwise and does us of what is stated today. in its not instill confidence in 6. In the normal circumstances we would not entertain a writ appeal against an order which is subject to objections and is good only for two weeks. However, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, deem it necessary to direct that till such time we as the issue is considered by the learned single Judge on merits, status quo be maintained on spot. 7. Be that as it may, the Writ Appeai is disposed of with a direction to the Registry to iist WP.No.17601 of 2023 after two weeks as directed by the learned singie Judge and tiii such time as the matter is considered on merits. 3 HG &CGR,J WA_962 2025 status quo be maintained with regard to possession on spot. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- V. DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principle Secretary, Social Welfare Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Building, Velagapudi at Amaravathi Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, N.T.R District at Vijayawada Erstwhile Krishna District. The Sub Divisional Magistrate Cum Sub Collector, N.T.R District at Vijayawada. 3. The Sub Divisional Magistrate Cum Sub Collector, N.T.R District at Vijayawada Erst While Krishna District. 4. The Circle Inspector of Police, Patamata Police Station, Vijayawada, N.T.R district. Erst While Krishna District. 5. One CC to Sri T. M. K. Chaitanya, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to Sri A. K. Kishore Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 8. Two CCs to GP for Social Welfare, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 9. The Registrar(Judicial), High Court of A.P. at Amaravati. 10.The Section Officer, Writ(Non-Service) Section, High Court of A.P. at Amaravati. 11.The Section Officer, Posting Section, High Court of A.P. at Amaravati. 12.Two CD Copies. ssb T HIGH COURT DATED:03/09/2025 JUDGMENT WA No. 962 OF 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.A. WITHOUT COSTS