Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3175 (ORI)

LAXMIDHAR BEHERA v. DATTATRAYA BHAUSAHEB SHINDE,COLLECTOR-CUM-DISTRICT MAGISTRATE CUTTACK

CONTC/5263/2025 · 2026-01-20

S K Panigrahi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.5263 of 2025 Laxmidhar Behera & Anr. …. Petitioner(s) Mr. Jajati Kishore Mohanty, Adv. -versus- Sri Dattatraya Bhausaheb Shinde, Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Cuttack …. Opposite Party(s) Mr. Amitabh Pradhan, Adv. Mr. Sashibhusan Das, Adv. CORAM: HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI Order No. ORDER 20.01.2026 I.A. Nos.34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 & 51 of 2026 06. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. These I.As have been filed for recalling the order dated 06.01.2026 passed in CONTC No.5263 of 2025. 3. Heard. 4. Considering the submissions made on behalf of both the parties and since the applicants in the above noted I.As were not impleaded as parties to the proceeding from which the above noted CONTC arises, this Court is not inclined to entertain the above noted I.As. 5. These I.As are, accordingly, dismissed. Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 21-Jan-2026 19:11:49 Signature Not Verified CONTC No.5263 of 2025 6. Heard. 7. At the outset, learned counsel for the Opposite Party(s) / Contemnor(s), on instruction, submits that necessary steps have already been taken for clearance of the unauthorized encroachment made over the disputed property in question. 8. In such view of the matter, this Court directs the Opposite Party(s)/ Contemnor(s) to take effective steps as per law for eviction of the unauthorized encroachers from the disputed property in question. 9. This CONTC is, accordingly, disposed of being dropped. (Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Ayaskanta Designation: Personal Assistant