Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31747 (JHR)

LAL JAGDHATRI NATH SHAHDEO v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/7365/2023 · 2025-03-25

Rajesh Shankar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.7365 of 2023 ----- 1. Lal Jagdhatri Nath Shahdeo aged about 76 years, son of Late Lal Haldhar Nath Shahdeo, resident of village Dungri, P.O. Hatia, P.S. Kharsidag O.P., District Ranchi (Jharkhand). 2. Lal Ganpati Nath Shahdeo @ Ganpati Nath Shahdeo aged about 70 years, son of Lal Nilkanth Nath Shahdeo, resident of village Dungri, P.O. Hatia, P.S. Kharsidag O.P., District Ranchi (Jharkhand). 3. Lal Satya Narayan Nath Shahdeo, aged about 51 years, son of Late Lal Randhir Nath Shahdeo, resident of village Dungri, P.O. Hatia, P.S. Kharsidag O.P., District Ranchi (Jharkhand). 4. Dazi Shahdeo @ Dazi Rani, aged about 41 years wife of Late Lal Murari Nath Shahdeo, resident of village Dungri, P.O. Hatia, P.S. Kharsidag O.P., District Ranchi (Jharkhand). 5. Manoj Nath Shahdeo, aged about 42 years, son of Lal Hari Har Nath Shahdeo, resident of village Dungri, P.O. Hatia, P.S. Kharsidag O.P., District Ranchi (Jharkhand). ........... Petitioners. -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Secretary, Revenue, Land Reforms and Registration, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi. 4. Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Ranchi. 5. Circle Officer, Namkum, Ranchi. 6. Chandar Oraon son of Rusu Oraon resident of village Pugdu, P.O. O.P. Dhurwa, P.S. Tupudana, District-Ranchi. .......... Respondents. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Amar Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mr. Kundan Kumar Ambastha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Kishore Kumar Singh, S.C.-V ----- Order No.07 Date: 25.03.2025 1. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to take recourse before the competent court of civil jurisdiction for redressal of their grievances. 2. Considering the said prayer, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Rohit/ -2- W.P.(C) No.7365 of 2023