Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:4694] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16461/2024
1. Sushila Wife of Shri Latoor, Aged About 32 Years, Resident of Dabich Bairwan, Tehsil Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.).
2. Latoor Son of Shri Ramnath, Aged About 35 Years, Resident of Dabich Bairwan, Tehsil Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, through Its Collector, Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.).
2. Tehsildar, Tehsil Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.).
3. Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Babu Lal Bairwa HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 03/02/2025
1. By means of filing instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners have challenged the notice dated 23.09.2024, passed by the Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur, in exercise of power under Section 91 of Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956.
2. It is not in dispute that against the show cause notice, petitioners have remedy to either represent before the Naib Tehsildar himself or avail the statutory remedy of appeal thereagainst in view of Sections 75(a) of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act.
[2025:RJ-JP:4694] (2 of 2) [CW-16461/2024]
3. This Court is not inclined to exercise its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the impugned notice. Hence, the instant writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy available under the law.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J AMIT/88