APHC010464642025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 24003/2025 Between: 1. CHEJARLA RAMANA KUMAR, S/O.LATE CHENGALRAJU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O.FLAT NO.302, HARICHARAN APARTMENT, UPADYAYA NAGAR, 15TH CROSS, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI URBAN, OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, NOW TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ALIPIRI POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, NOW TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring that the Respondent No.5 cannot interfere in any civil disputes between the citizens and cannot take on themselves the function of a civil court at the instance of the third parties by repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station and threatening him to settle the financial disputes between them being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India apart from being violative of Principles of Natural Justice 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “....to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring that the Respondent No.5 cannot interfere in any civil disputes between the citizens and cannot take on themselves the function of a civil court at the instance of the third parties by repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station and threatening him to settle the financial disputes between them being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India apart from being violative of Principles of Natural Justice ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on instructions would submit that respondent Police never interfered in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the third party and never threatened to settle the financial disputes pending between them and would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 3 In the light of the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 24003 of 2025 12.09.2025 Mjl /*