LAKHAN SINGH RAJPUT S/O NADAN SINGH RAJPUT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLR/2220/2019 · 2025-07-14
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31737 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31737 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:26189] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 2220/2019 Lakhan Singh Rajput S/o Nadan Singh Rajput, R/o Gothri Purohitan, P.s. Baroda Mev, Laxmangarh, Alwar Raj. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Inder Singh S/o Bheiru Singh, R/o Village Khohara Chauhan, P.s. Rajgarh, Distt. Alwar Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Shobha Sharma for Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 14/07/2025
1. Considered submissions of learned counsel for petitioner complainant.
2. Instant revision petition is preferred by petitioner after dismissal of application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. in sessions case no. 56/2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rajgarh, District Alwar.
3. A status report is called from learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rajgarh which indicate that the prosecution evidence has been closed and the matter is fixed for supplementary arguments on 15.07.2025.
4. After considering submissions and material available on record including statement of witnesses, I am of the considered view that no case is made out for taking cognizance under Section
[2025:RJ-JP:26189] (2 of 2) [CRLR-2220/2019] 319 Cr.P.C. and trial court has not committed any error therefore this revision petition is liable to be dismissed.
5. In view of discussion made hereinabove, the instant revision petition is hereby dismissed with pending application, if any.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /76