HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9435 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. None is present on behalf of the informant. 2. Heard Sri Shashi Dhar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri R.P. Patel, learned State Law Officer and perused the record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 16 of 2024, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of IPC and Section 66-D of I.T. Act, Police Station Cyber Crime Basti, District Basti, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the said offence. 5. Learned counsel has next stated that there is no evidence that the applicant had lured any person to transfer the amount to his account. The applicant was employed in the company in which the informant was also working. The allegations are per se false. It is a clear cut case of false implication, as such the applicant is entitled for bail. 6. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 28.10.2024 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 7. Learned State Law Officer has vehemently opposed the bail application. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shashi Dhar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Santosh Kumar Pandey Sanjay Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant- Sanjay Singh, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during trial. ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 10. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 11. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. September 15, 2025 Sumit S BAIL No. 9435 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad