Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31736 (AP)

PADALA VANDANA, W.G. DIST. v. C.M.D., APTRANSCO., HYD & 4 OT

WP/19351/2013 · 2025-06-25

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010463712013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 19351/2013 Between: 1. PADALA VANDANA, W.G. DIST., D/O. PANASA RAMA REDDY, AGED 28 YEARS, OCC: RESEARCH SCHOLAR AT GERMANY, RIO.SCHNEIDLINGER STRABE 3 FERMERSLEBERG WEG 36 MAGDEBURG 39112, SAXONY ANNAHLT, GERRNANY.REPRESENTED BY HER G.P.A.HOLDER SRI.PADALA PANASA RAMA REDDY, S/O.SATYANARAYANA REDDY, AGED 56 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O.H.NO.19-120/1, SI VALAYAM STREET, PENUGONDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL,WEST GODAVARI- 534320 ...PETITIONER AND 1. C M D APTRANSCO HYD 4 OT, REPRESENTED BY ITS C.M.D., VIDYUTH SOUDHA, SOMAJIGUDA, HYDERABAD 2. A P EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS C.M.D. VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, A.P. EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED, SUB-STATION, ELURU. 4. THE ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OPERATION, A.P. EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED, PENUGONDA, TANUKU.W.G.DISTRICT 5. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER OPERATION, A.P. EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED, PENUGONDA. Page 2 of 4 W.G.DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto the issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in laying electricity lines in the Petitioner' property situated at Penugonda Village & Mandal, West Godavari District and destroying petitioner coconut trees without giving petitioner any compensation and without following due process of law as illegal and arbitrary, in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 23665 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to pay compensation to the Petitioner before starting the supply of electricity into the poles and towers erected in the Petitioner's property situated at Penugonda Village & Mandal, West Godavari District and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 44702 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased implead the Proposed 6th Respondent as Respondent No.6 in W.P.No.19351 of 2013 IA NO: 5 OF 2013(WPMP 151495 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WVMP 852 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 13.12.2013 passed in WPMP.No.23665 of 2013 in WP.No.19351 of 2013 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 11468 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased expedited the Writ Petition No. 19351 of 2013 to fix an early date for hearing the said writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PRABHAKAR SRIPADA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 2. P ANAND SESHU (SC FOR APEPDCL) The Court made the following order: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed 24.06.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 3. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 26.06.2025 IKN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 19351 of 2013 Date: 26.06.2025 IKN