Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3172 (UTT)

SUNITA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/362/2021 · 2025-02-10

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:660 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No.362 of 2021 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Arjun Arora, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Bora, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. J.P. Kandpal, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners makes a statement at the bar that the writ petition has become infructuous, due to subsequent events. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 10.02.2025 Arpan 2025:UHC:660