IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 88 of 2025 Date of Decision: 13.10.2025 _______________________________________________________ Anand Swaroop …….Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh … Respondent ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Tanu, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Having carefully perused compliance affidavit filed in terms of the directions issued by this Court, learned counsel representing the petitioner fairly states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands duly complied with and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, same is disposed of. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate court of law qua the surviving grievance, if any. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge October, 13, 2025 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?