APHC010457352025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 24244/2025 Between: 1. PINJARI ALLIPEERA, S/O. PINGARI KARRENNA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O. JOHARAPURAM VILLAGE, ASPARI MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PATTIKONDA, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, PATTIKONDA, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. PINJARI KABALA SAHEB, S/O. PINGARI KARRENNA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O. JOHARAPURAM VILLAGE, ASPARI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased action of the Respondents in not considering the Petitioner's representation dated. 19.05.2025 made through registed post requesting to mutate the his name for agricultural land in Sy.No. 17-2 to an 2 extent of Ac.2.00 cents out of Ac.4.09 cetns of Nalakadoddi Village, Pattikonda Mandal, Kurnool District as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstutional and voilative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and contrary to the A.P. Pattadar Pass Books act and the procedure contemplated therein and consequently direct the Respondents to forth with consider the representation dated. 19.05.2025 made through registered post and requested to enter the petitioner's name in all revenue records in connection with agricultural land in Sy.No. 17-2 to an extent of Ac.2.00 cents out of Ac.4.09 cetns of Nalakadoddi Village, Pattikonda Mandal, Kurnool District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents to enter the Petitioner’s name in all revenue records by duly considering the representation dated. 19.05.2025 made through registered post requesting to mutate the his name for agricultural land in Sy.No. 17-2 to an extent of Ac.2.00 cents out of Ac.4.09 cetns of Nalakadoddi Village, Pattikonda Mandal, Kurnool District pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RACHURI LAKSHMIKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 24244/2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner's representation dated 19.05.2025 made through registered post requesting to mutate his name for agricultural land in Sy.No.17-2 to an extent of Ac.2.00 cents out of Ac.4.09 cents of Nalakadoddi Village, Pattikonda Mandal, Kurnool District as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and voilative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and contrary to the A.P. Pattadar Pass Books Act and the procedure contemplated therein and consequently direct the respondents to forth with consider the representation dated 19.05.2025 made through registered post and requested to enter the petitioner's name in all revenue records in connection with agricultural land in Sy.No. 17-2 to an extent of Ac.2.00 cents out of Ac.4.09 cents of Nalakadoddi Village, Pattikonda Mandal, Kurnool District and pass such other order.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. 3. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to issue a direction to the respondents to consider the representation dated 19.05.2025. 4 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue readily agreed to consider the representation dated 19.05.2025, if any pending with the respondents. 5. In view of the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in “The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1”, wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the representation dated 19.05.2025, this Court find no other alternative except to issue such direction. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation dated 19.05.2025 redressing the grievance of the petitioner, after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of three(3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. 1 2019 (8) SCALE 544 5 As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 12.09.2025 TTPPSS 6 171 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 24244/2025 12.09.2025 TTPPSS