Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:15300 WP No. 23426 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO.23426 OF 2021 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
MR. PRAKASH K.S.
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT NO.44, 2ND MAIN 2ND STAGE, NGEF LAYOUT NAGARBHAVI, BENGLAURU 560 072. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. KAVITHA D, ADV., [ABSENT]) AND:
M/S CANARA BANK (E-SYNDICATE BANK) RPC LAYOUT BRANCH NO.2920/A CHORD ROAD RPC LAYOUT, BENGLAURU 560 040 REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER. …RESPONDENT
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DTD 06.11.2021 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK IN FURTHERANCE OF THE
ORDER PASSED BY THE IX ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE IN CRL. MIS.NO.4470/2019 DTD 02.11.2019 VIDE ANNX-F.
ISSUE DIRECTIONS TO THE RESPONDENT BANK, PENDING THE DISPOSAL OF THE WRIT PETITION, NOT TO PROCEED FURTHER WITH ANY ACTION AGAINST THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY OF PETITIONERS & ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:15300 WP No. 23426 of 2021
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioner is before this Court, seeking the following reliefs:
"a) Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned Notice dated 06.11.2021 issued by the Respondent Bank in furtherance of the order passed by the IX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate in Crl.Mis.No.4470/2019 dated 02.11.2019 which is annexed as per ANNEXURE-F.
b) Issue directions to the Respondent-Bank, pending the disposal of the Writ Petition, not to proceed further with any action against the scheduled property of petitioners.
c) Issue such other order or direction as may be deemed fit to grant in the circumstances of the case."
2. Despite the order dated 26.03.2025, none appears for the petitioner today also and process fee has also not been paid. It appears that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
ABK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27