Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31701 (RAJ)

DR. GANGADHAR MITTAL S/O SHRI RAM LAL JI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CCP/996/2024 · 2025-08-28

Ganesh Ram Meena

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:34291] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 996/2024 1. Dr. Gangadhar Mittal S/o Shri Ram Lal Ji, Since Deceased Through His Legal Heirs. 2. Rohit Mittal Son Of Late Dr. Gangadhar Mittal, R/o Village Salpura-Kawai, Tehsil Atru, District Baran 3. Peeyush Mittal S/o Late Dr. Gangadhar Mittal, R/o Village Salpura-Kawai, Tehsil Atru, District Baran ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Director, Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur 2. Dr. Ravi Prakash Mathur, Director, Medical And Health Ser- vices, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur 3. Shri M.p. Singh, Joint Director, Medical And Health Ser- vices, Kota Zone, Kota 4. Dr. Sampat Rai Nagar, Chief Medical And Health Officer, Baran 5. Dr. Devraj, Director, Pension Department, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Jindal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG alongwith Ms. Tanvisha Pant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 28/08/2025 Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG appearing for the respondents submits that the order of the Court has been complied with and the peti- tioner has been allowed the interest on the delayed retiral pay- ment. He further submits that necessary orders have already been issued and bills for the due amount has also been prepared and [2025:RJ-JP:34291] (2 of 2) [CCP-996/2024] the amount will be credited in the account of the petitioner in a short period. He has also placed before the Court the orders is- sued in this regard and the copy of the treasury bill, which are taken on record. In view of the documents placed before this Court and in view of the fact that necessary order has already been issued and the bill for due amount has already been prepared, this Court deems that the order of the Court has been complied with and no cause of action survives to continue this contempt petition. Accordingly, this contempt petition is disposed of. Notices discharged. In case the petitioners feel any grievance, they may either avail the appropriate remedy or may move appropriate application for revival of this contempt petition. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /Satyendra/15