- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:16417 WP No. 20375 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 20375 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. C. CHINTHAMANI W/O V. SUNDARESAN, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, RESIDING AT SITE NO.2, SY.NO.4/4, 2ND CROSS, PALAR NAGAR, D.K. HALLI PLANTATION, BEML NAGAR, KGF, BANGARPET, KOLAR - 563 115 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KRISHNA T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. S. VINODH KUMAR S/O. V SUNDARESAN, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO 41, MINU NILAYAM, SITE NO.2, SY.NO.4/4, 2ND CROSS, PALAR NAGAR, D.K. HALLI PLANTATION BEML NAGAR, KGF, BANGARPET, KOLAR - 563 115 Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:16417 WP No. 20375 of 2023 2. S. VINODH KUMAR S/O. V. SUNDARESAN, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, PROP M/S V.V. ENTERPRISES, NO.228, 4TH MAIN ROAD, 5TH CROSS, VIVEK NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 047 3. STATE BANK OF INDIA BEML NAGAR BRANCH, KOLAR GOLD FIELDS BANGARPET, KOLAR - 563 115 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER SRI. P. KONDAL RAO CHIEF MANAGER …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.G. SUDHA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 R2 AND R3 SERVED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 24.07.2023 IN CRL.MISC.NO.40/2023, PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KOLAR PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A, GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE OPERATION AND EXECUTION OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 24.07.2023 IN CRL.MISC.NO.40/2023, PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KOLAR, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:16417 WP No. 20375 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL In the above matter, as the Petitioner and Respondent No.2 have come to an amicable settlement and as Respondent No.2 has agreed to close the loan account after negotiations with Respondent No.3 Bank, the writ petition may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn." In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JY List No.: 5 Sl No.: 6 CT:BHK