1 2025:CGHC:29594 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2016 of 2025 Dwarika Mandavi S/o Hemant Kumar Mandavi Aged About 21 Years R/o Ward No. 19, Shiv Mandir Marar Para Balod Police Station And District- Balod, Chhattisgarh.(Wrongly Mentioned As Drarika In The Cause Title Of The Impugned Order) ... Petitioner versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, Police Station- Balod District- Balod Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent For petitioners : None For respondent /State : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 01.07.2025 1. This is an office reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 02.01.2025, passed in MCRC No. 9010 of 2024, while allowing the bail to the petitioner, namely, Dwarika Mandavi had expressed its trust that the trial Court should make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of 06 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. 3. It transpires from the perusla of the PUD that in this case it is respectfully requested that I am posted in Balod on the post of District and VAIBHAV SINGH Digitally signed by VAIBHAV SINGH Date: 2025.07.02 18:37:28 +0530 2 Additional Sessions Judge (FTC) from 01.04.2025. The case of reference number 02 was received by me on transfer on 05.04.2025, the next date of which was fixed as 07.05.2025. Despite the summer vacation period, all the essential witnesses have been examined by me in the last period of about one and a half months, only the examination of the investigator is pending. From 23.06.2025 to 28.06.2025, I have to go to Chhattisgarh As per instructions, one has to attend the training program of newly appointed District Judge (Entry Level) organized at the State Judicial Academy, Bilaspur. In such circumstances, it does not seem possible to dispose of the case referred to in number 2 by 01.07.2025. Therefore, it is requested that after considering the above circumstances, please extend the time limit for resolution of the case 4. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of three months from today. 5. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 6. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaibhav