HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 9892 of 2025 Court No. - 92 HON'BLE RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P., learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and perused the record. 2. This application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed for quashing the entire criminal proceedings of Case No. 1894 of 2020 (State vs. Azam Sabhasad and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 170 of 2020, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 336, 427, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Khuldabad, District Allahabad, pending before ACJM, court no. 9, Allahabad in the light of compromise dated 19.2.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that co-accused in the present case has also file Application u/s 528 BNSS No. 22435 of 2025 in which also compromise has been filed between the informant the applicants and same has been duly verified by order of this Court. Learned counsel for the applicants as well as opposite party No.2 jointly submitted that vide order dated 3.4.2025 a direction was given to the court below to verify the compromise executed by the parties. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, learned court below had verified the contents of compromise. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 submitted that the parties have entered into compromise, which has duly been verified by the court below vide report dated 12.5.2025 and the same has been filed alongwith supplementary affidavit. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Abrar Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Mohammad Waseem, G.A. Mohd Imran And 11 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Learned A.G.A. has fairly conceded that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the court below. 6. Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice as has been held in Gian Singh Vs State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 7. In view of the aforesaid and the fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further, the matter is purely of personal nature, which has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 8. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed and consequently, entire criminal proceedings of aforesaid case are hereby quashed. September 23, 2025 Dhirendra/ NA528 No. 9892 of 2025 2 (Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.) Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad