1 2025:HHC:34562 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Execution Petition No.180 of 2025 Decided on: 10 th October , 2025 __________________________________________________ Bansi Lal ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents No.1 to 3-State. Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4. G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice (Oral) The Execution Petition has been filed seeking benefits of judgment passed in CWPOA No.6996/2020 titled Bansi Lal vs. State of H.P. & Ors., which was decided along with a bunch of 565 matters, the lead case of which was LPA No.165 of 2021 titled State of H.P. and others vs. Surajmani and another decided on 12.01.2023. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. Counsel for the State has placed on record the order dated 27.08.2025 passed by the Divisional Forest Officer, Pangi, Killar, whereby the work-charge status has been granted to the petitioner from 01.01.2003 on notional basis and the same is to be counted for re-fixation of pay as per the judgment of the Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.1595 of 2025 (arising out of SLP(C) No.23016 of 2023) titled The State of Himachal Pradesh & others vs. Surajmani & another decided on 06.02.2025. 3. As per the letter, admittedly the petitioner has retired, therefore, his pension will have to be re-fixed accordingly. 4. Resultantly, we implead the Accountant General, H.P., as respondent No.4 in the petition. 5. Notice. Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.4. 6. Keeping in view the above, the Execution Petition stands disposed of as being satisfied, with further directions that the office of Accountant General shall process the case of pensionary benefits within a period of eight weeks from today. 3 7. It is made clear, that if needful is not done, an application can be filed for revival of the case. 8. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( G.S. Sandhawalia ) Chief Justice 10 th October , 2025 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge