Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31680 (JHR)

ARBIND KUMAR JAISWAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./155/2025 · 2025-01-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.155 of 2025 ------ 1. Arbind Kumar Jaiswal @ Arbind Kumar Jaisawal aged about 44 years, Son of Krishna Prasad, Resident of village Prakala, Kinda, P.O. & P.S. Khinda, District Simdega. 2. Md. Sarfraj Alam @ Md. Sarfaraj Alam aged about 39 years, Son of Mumtaj Alam, Resident of village Idgah Mohalla, P.O. and P.S. Simdega, District Simdega. 3. Asim Bindu Samad aged about 37 years, Son of Patras Samad, Resident of village Naigam Toli, P.O. & P.S. Simdega, District Simdega. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Gaurav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 17-01-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Simdega P.S. Case No.140 of 2024 instituted under Sections 61 (1) (B), 318, 292 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3/4 of Bihar and Bengal Gambling Act, 1867, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were involved in gambling. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-14 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Simdega in connection with Simdega P.S. Case No.140 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/