MANSA RAM AND OTHERS v. UT OF J AND K TH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KATHUA
WP(C)/1128/2025 · 2025-05-13
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3168 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3168 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case No.:- WP(C) No. 1128/2025
1. Mansa Ram, Aged 68 years S/o Sh. Devi Ram R/o Dabwal, Tehsil & District Kathua, 184143.
2. Rajinder Kumar, Aged 66 years S/o Sh. Devi Ram R/o Dabwal, Tehsil & District Kathua, 184143.
3. Sudesh Kumar, Aged 52 years S/o Sh. Devi Ram R/o Dabwal, Tehsil & District Kathua, 184143.
4. Mehar Singh, Aged 48 years S/o Sh. Devi Ram R/o Dabwal, Tehsil & District Kathua, 184143.
5. Amar Nath, Aged 72 years S/o Sh. Devi Ram R/o Dabwal, Tehsil & District Kathua, 184143.
6. Ram Singh, Aged 50 years S/o Sh. Devi Ram R/o Dabwal, Tehsil & District Kathua, 184143.
7. Devi Ram, Aged 84 years S/o Lt. Sh. Gokul R/o Dabwal, Tehsil & District Kathua, 184143.
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Avish Sharma, Advocate.
Vs
UT of Jammu & Kashmir through Deputy Commissioner, Kathua 9CQ9+8FC Secretariat, College Rd. Shiva Nagar, Kathua, Jammu & Kashmir, 184104.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through:
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
Sr. No. 5
2 WP(C) No. 1128/2025
ORDER 13.05.2025
1. This petition is by seven petitioners claiming themselves to be the cultivators of the land forming subject matter of the writ petition.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has not taken trouble of coming up with bare minimum averments in the writ petition by reference to each petitioner as to how much land in which particular khasra number he or she has been in the purported cultivating possession so as to draw out the alleged cause of action to come together with the joint writ petition.
3. Therefore, this writ petition in its present format, as preferred by the writ petitioners collectively, is dismissed without prejudice to their rights to come up with the writ petition, be it jointly or individually, with full and better particulars so as to relieve this Court from the burden of fishing out the facts and circumstances on the basis of which, the seven petitioners joined to come up with the present facts deficient writ petition.
4. Connected application also stands disposed of accordingly.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
13.05.2025
Naresh/Secy.
Naresh Kumar 2025.05.14 09:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document