IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Pet. No.103 of 2025 Decided on: 25th June, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chint Ram …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Prem P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner seeks enforcement of Chint Ram Versus State of H.P. & Ors.2, wherein the respondents were directed to decide the case of the petitioner keeping in view certain decisions mentioned therein. 2. Respondents have filed the compliance affidavit, conveying that the case of the petitioner has been considered. He has been granted the benefit as extended to similarly situated incumbents, namely S/Sh. Madan Lal and Prem Sukh. The arrears as mentioned in the 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 CWP No.4568 of 2024, decided on 24.05.2024 2 compliance affidavit have been computed payable to the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner expresses his reservation to the restriction of actual monetary benefits in favour of the petitioner for a period of three years prior to filing of the writ petition. Taking note of the compliance affidavit and the documents appended therewith, the present execution petition to stand disposed of. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua June 25, 2026 Judge Mukesh