VED PRAKASH DHANETWAL S/O SHRI HARISH CHANDRA DHANETWAL v. UNION OF INDIA
CW/16960/2019 · 2025-03-04
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31668 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31668 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:9371] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16960/2019
1. Ved Prakash Dhanetwal S/o Shri Harish Chandra Dhanetwal, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Ganesh Chowk, Post Mahuwa, District Dausa (Raj.) (At Present R/o E-568, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur)
2. Smt. Asha Dhanetwal W/o Shri Ved Prakash Dhanetwal, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Ganesh Chowk, Post Mahuwa, District Dausa (Raj.) (At Present R/o E-568, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur) ----Petitioners Versus
1. Union Of India, Through Director, Directorate Of Enforcement, Government Of India, Zonal Office, 2Nd Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-Ii, Lic Building, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur (Raj.) 302005
2. Deputy Director, Directorate Of Enforcement, Government Of India, Zonal Office, 2Nd Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-Ii, Lic Building, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur (Raj.) 302005
3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Inspector General (Stamp And Registration), 4Th Floor, Vitta Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. Executive Officer, (In The Matter Of M/s Adarsh Thought Works Pvt. Ltd.), Shri Shyam Murari Nigam (Retired Member, Cbdt), Elements Mall, Near Dcm Market, Ajmer Road, Jaipur (Raj.) 302021
5. M/s Adarsh, Thought Works Pvt. Ltd., Elements Mall, Near Dcm Market, Ajmer Road, Jaipur (Raj.) 302021 Through Its Director
6. M/s Vipul Premises Llp, 5 Jha 18, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) 302004 Through Its Director ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Shruti Jain for Mr. Akash Srivastava For Respondent(s) : Mr. Alam Sahni for Mr. Anand Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 04/03/2025
1. Counsel for petitioners, on instructions of petitioners, submits that with efflux of time, petitioners do not want to press
[2025:RJ-JP:9371] (2 of 2) [CW-16960/2019] the writ petition and seek permission to withdraw the same, with liberty to file afresh, in case of occurrence of subsequent events or accrual of fresh cause of action.
2. Respondents have no objection.
3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as not press with the liberty as prayed for.
4. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/67