¥ I K APHC010461832025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23819 OF 2025 Between; Sige Vijaya Lakshmi, W/o. Sige Srinivasulu Chinna Chowk, Kadapa, YSR District r/o. 37/843, Nehru Nagar, ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, AP Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati. 2. The Superintendent of Police, YSR District at Kadapa. 3. The Station House Officer, Khajipet Police Station, Khajipet, YSR District. 4. Valloor Shaik Mahaboob Chan, W/o. Shafiulla, Moulana Azad Street-1, Proddutur Town, Kadapa, YSR District D.No.22/397-1 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.3 in threatening petitioner and calling her to Police Station at the behest of unofficial respondents and pressurizing petitioner to settle her land with unofficial respondent as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the official respondents not to interfere in Civil matters and not to summon petitioner to the police station in the interests of justice. •A ■» . %'• • t %\ lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the Police Station or to Interfere in civil disputes pending disposal of the Writ Petition. iA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Implead the Tahsildar, Khajipet Mandal as respondent No.5 to present Writ Petition pending the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI DHARANI KUMAR B Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4; None appeared The Court made the following Order: • APHC010461832025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) BME [3396] wm TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23819/2025 Between: R/0. 37/843 1.S1GE VIJAYA LAKSHMI,, W/0. SIGE SRINIVASULU NEHRU NAGAR, CHINNA CHOWK, KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL HOME DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT. SECRETARY, VELAGAPUDI. AMARAVATI. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR DISTRICT AT KADAPA. 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER. KHAJIPET POLICE STATION. KHAJIPET, YSR DISTRICT. 4.VALLOOR SHAIK MAHABOOB CHAN, W/0 D.NO.22/397-1, MOULANA AZAD STREET-1 KADAPA. YSR DISTRICT SHAFIULLA PRODDUTUR TOWN ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.DHARANI KUMAR B Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME 2 \ THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23819 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: ",. pleased to issue any writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.3 in threatening petitioner and calling her to Police Station at the behest of unofficial respondents and land with unofficial pressurizing petitioner to settle her respondent as illegal and arbitrary and conseguently direct the official respondents not to interfere in Civil matters and not to petitioner to the police station in the interests of summon justice.... Heard Sri Dharani Kumar B, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri 2. V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent- police are calling the petitioner to the police station without there being any 3. crime registered against the petitioner. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents 4. written instructions would submit that on the oral complaint given by the respondent No.4, the respondent-police called both the parties to the police station for preliminary enquiry. After due enquiry, it came to light that the subject matter is of civil in nature. He would further submit that the police are not calling the petitioner to the police station and no crime has been registered against the petitioner. on 3 5. Considering the submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to not to call the petitioner to the police station absence of any crime against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. in As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand Sd/- K TATA RAO DERUTYREGiSTRAR closed. //TRUE COPY// FICER SECTION To, Home Department, AP Secretariat, 1. The Principal Secretary, Velagapudi, Amaravati. 2. The Superintendent of Police, YSR District at Kadapa. 3. The Station House Officer, Khajipet Police Station, Khajipet, YSR District. 4. One CC to SRI DHARANI KUMAR B, Advocate [OPUC] 5. TwoCCsto GP for HOME, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies vna 0 HIGH COURT DATED:09/09/2025 ORDER WP NO. 23819 OF 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS