Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31659 (ALL)

RANJEET v. STATE OF U.P.

NA528/9576/2025 · 2025-04-01

Sanjay Kumar Pachori

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:46345 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 9576 of 2025 Applicant :- Ranjeet Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Kumar,Vinod Kumar Tirpathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Heard Sri Amit Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. The present application under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed to quash the order dated 23.4.2025 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gautam Budh Nagar, in Case Crime No. 1110 of 2013, under Sections 380 and 457 of IPC, whereby the non-bailable warrants has been issued Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the impugned order has been passed by the court without satisfying itself that the summon and other process for attendance has been served and without issuing any summon or bailable warrant, direct N.B.W. has been issued. It is further submitted that applicant was on bail at the time of issuing non-bailable warrant. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that the impugned order has been passed without considering the facts and circumstances of the case and law provided in this regard. It is further submitted that order of the non-bailable warrant has been passed on 23.4.2025 without satisfying the service of summons or bailable warrants itself and reason to believe from absconding the process of the court. Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 have opposed the application. Considering submissions of learned counsel and perusing record, the instant application u/s 528 BNSS is finally disposed of with a direction that in case applicant appears before the court below within three weeks from today and applies for bail/recall of non bailable warrant, his application shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC Online SC 941. For a period of three weeks from today or till applicant appears before the court below, whichever is earlier, execution of non bailable warrant against the applicant shall be kept in abeyance. Order Date :- 2.4.2025 Akram Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AKRAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AKRAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad