Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:71596 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9501 of 2025 Applicant :- Meena Devi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- M.P.S. Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Brijendra Kumar, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record. 2. This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 27 of 2025, under Sections 191 (2), 191 (3), 190, 121 (2), 132, 125, 324 (5), 326 (g), 61 (2) (B), 109 (1) BNS and 3/4 Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act & 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Roravar, District Aligarh. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused- applicant is innocent and she has been falsely implicated in this case crime number. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the incident took place on 28.01.2025 at 19:00 hours and its first information report was lodged on 29.01.2025 at 3:40 hours without giving any explanation for delay in lodging the FIR. The inured persons have been medically examined on 28.01.2025 and 31.01.2025 with the collusion of doctors the injuries caused by hard and blunt object KUO and advise for X-ray, but till date there is no supplementary report of any inured person has been prepared. In fact no such incident has been taken place on the said date time and place and the applicant is not concerned with the alleged incident, but the police has been falsely implicated in such false and frivolous case due to ulterior motive in order to cause harm and harassment to the applicant. There is no specific role has been assigned to the applicant. It is further submitted that on the similar footing the co-accused have been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 18.04.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.9514 of 2025, 9389 of2025 and 7916 of 2026, therefore, applicant is also entitled to be released on bail.The applicant is languishing in jail since 24.02.2025. She has no criminal antecedent and there are no likelihood of her fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. 4. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima-facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 7. Let the accused-applicant, Meena Devi, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on their executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: a. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. b. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. c. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. d. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless her personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. 8. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel her bail. Order Date :- 5.5.2025 pks Digitally signed by :- PAWAN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad