912 CA 5349-2022 to 915, 917 & 918 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 912 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5349 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 2123 OF 2022 ASARAM BAPURAO YESLOTE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR JALNA AND OTHERS … Mr. Durgesh M. Pingale – Advocate for Applicants Mr. R.B. Dhaware – AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, State …. AND 913 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12649 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 14111 OF 2022 KOKILABAI BHAGWAN PATIL VERSUS SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER JALGAON AND ANOTHER … Mr. Durgesh M. Pingale – Advocate for Applicant Mr. R.D. Raut – AGP for Respondent No.1, State Mr. Bipinchandra K. Patil – Advocate for Respondent No.2 …. AND 914 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12789 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 15125 OF 2022 MANIKRAO S/O YADAVRAO PADOL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR JALNA AND OTHERS … Mr. Durgesh M. Pingale – Advocate for Applicant Mr. D.J. Patil – AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, State Mr. S.G. Bhalerao – Advocate for Respondent No.3 …. AND Pooja Kale 1/4 2025:BHC-AUG:3828 912 CA 5349-2022 to 915, 917 & 918 915 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13961 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 16336 OF 2022 SHASHIKALA W/O RATAN PANJAGE (DIED) THROUGH L.RS. RATAN AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR JALNA AND OTHERS … Mr. Durgesh M. Pingale – Advocate for Applicants Mr. R.B. Dhaware – AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, State Mr. S.G. Bhalerao – Advocate for Respondent No.3 …. AND 917 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2862 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 32017 OF 2022 SHRIRAM VISHWANATH SHELKE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR JALNA AND OTHERS … Mr. Durgesh M. Pingale – Advocate for Applicant Mr. D.J. Patil – AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, State Mr. S.G. Bhalerao – Advocate for Respondent No.3 …. AND 918 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6745 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 32704 OF 2022 BHIMA DAGDU SADAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR JALNA AND OTHERS … Mr. Durgesh M. Pingale – Advocate for Applicant Mr. R.B. Dhaware – AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, State …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. DATE : 11th February, 2025 Pooja Kale 2/4 912 CA 5349-2022 to 915, 917 & 918 PER COURT : 1. Heard rival submissions. 2. The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods mentioned in these applications, which appear to be caused due to their poor financial condition. 3. Learned A.G.P. as well as learned Counsel for acquiring body in one matter strongly opposed the application on the ground that, no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay periods. 4. However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay periods mentioned in these applications stand condoned subject to cost of Rs.3,000/- (rupees Three Thousands only) each to be paid to be paid to the Registry of this Court for utilization of High Court Dispensary, Bench at Aurangabad. 5. It is made clear that, the applicants shall not claim any interest and statutory benefits for the periods of aforesaid delay. 6. The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any. Pooja Kale 3/4 912 CA 5349-2022 to 915, 917 & 918 7. The applications are accordingly disposed of. 8. Call for record and proceeding. [ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE Pooja Kale 4/4