Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31647 (AP)

Paleti @ Pidatala Naveen Chandra v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/29292/2022 · 2025-09-09

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

5 APHC010463302022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29292 OF 2022 Between: Paleti @ Pidatala Naveen Chandra, S/o. Pidatala Chinna Masthanaiah, aged about 36 years, R/o 3/4/84. Santhi Nagar, Gudur, Tirupati District earlier Nellore District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department. Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District earlier Nellore District. 3. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Gudur, Tirupati District earlier Nellore District. 4. The Station House Officer, Gudur I Town Police Station, Tirupati District earlier Nellore District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing the Suspect sheet no. 52 against the petitioner in the 4'^^ respondent's police station by virtue of the proceedings in C.N0.779/GL-SDOG/2013 dated 05.9.2013 illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, Article 19(1)(g) and Article 21 of the as Constitution of India and to consequently direct the respondents to discontinue the Suspect sheet no. 52 against the petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not call the petitioner to the 4'" respondent police station under the guise of impugned Suspect sheet No. 52 pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M RAVINDRA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: APHC010463302022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29292/2022 Between: 1.PALETI @ PIDATALA NAVEEN CHANDRA. S O. PIDATALA CHINNA MASTHANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/0 3/4/84. SANTHI NAGAR, GUDUR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT EARLIER NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT EARLIER NELLORE DISTRICT. 3.THE SUBDMSIONAL POLICE OFFICER, GUDUR TIRUPATI DISTRICT EARLIER NELLORE DISTRICT. 4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GUDUR I TOWN POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI DISTRICT EARLIER NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.MRAVINDRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for; “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing the Suspect sheet no. 52 against the petitioner in the 4th respondent's police station by virtue of the proceedings in C.N0.779/GL-SDOG/2013 dated 05.9.2013 as illegal, arbitrary and violative,of Article 14, Article 19(1) (g) and Article 21 of . 2 the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the respondents to discontinue the Suspect sheet no. 52 against the petitioner. ” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that there are no cases pending against the Petitioner and to curb and curtail the unlawful activities of the Petitioner the Suspect Sheet No.52 on the file of Gudur I Town Police Station, Tirupati District has been opened against the Petitioner. Sri M.Ravindra, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, no 3. cases are pending against the Petitioner and hence, the suspect sheet opened against the Petitioner may be closed. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned Suspect Sheet No.52 vide proceedings dated 05.09.2013 in C.NO.779/GL-SDOG/2013 against the Petitioner is hereby set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ^OFFICER closed. //TRUE COPY// SECTIO To, The Principal Secretary Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District earlier Nellore District. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Gudur Tirupati District earlier Nellore District. The Station House Officer, Gudur I Town Police station, Tirupati District earlier Nellore District. One ,CC to Sri M Ravindra, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CD Copies 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. RAM HIGH COURT DATED: 10/09/2025 ORDER WP NO. 29292 OF 2022 S 20 SEP 2025 ^ . Current Section * f ALLOWING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS